بِسْمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحْمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
![]() |
Art of Bronze Serpent & Al-Ḥajaru al-Aswad |
- A short Islamic View on The Black Stone
- Sin expiation vs Sin removal
- Analyzing Flawed Allegation & Inconsistencies of The Critics
- Idolatry vs God's Command
- The Bronze Serpent: A Parallel Analogy
- False Equivalency on Bronze Serpent: A Counter Argument
- Tu Quoque Fallacy: A Counter Argument
- Misuse of Fallacies: A Counter Argument
- Engagement with Critics' Core Concerns
- Final Thought
Ibn `Abbas said:
The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “When
the Black Stone came down from Paradise, it was whiter than milk, but the sins
of the sons of Adam made it black.” (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, 877; Ahmad,
2792. Classed as authentic by Ibn Khuzaymah, 4/219. Al-Hafidh ibn Hajar classed
it as sound in Fat-h Al-Bari, 3/462)
Interpretation of the above hadith,"...the sins of the sons of Adam made it black..."
🔰Al-Mubarakfuri said in Al-Mirqah: “This means, the sins of the sons of Adam who touched the stone, caused it to turn black. The Hadith should be taken at face value, because there is no reason not to, either narrated in a report or by virtue of common sense.” (Tuhfat Al-Ahwadhi, 3/525).
🔰Al-Hafidh ibn Hajar said: “Some heretics tried to criticise this Hadith by saying: How come the sins of the polytheists turned it black and the worship of the people of Tawhid did not make it white?”I answer by quoting what Ibn Qutaybah said: “If Allah had willed, that would have happened. But Allah has caused it to be the case that black usually changes other colours and it is not itself changed, which is the opposite to what happens with white.”
🔰Al-Muhibb At-Tabari said: “The fact that it is black is a lesson for those who have insight. If sins can have this effect on an inanimate rock, then the effect they have on the heart is greater” (See Fat-h Al-Bari, 3/463)
Ibn `Abbas said: The
Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said concerning
the Stone: “By Allah, Allah will bring it forth on the Day of Resurrection,
and it will have two eyes with which it will see and a tongue with which it
will speak, and it will testify in favour of those who touched it in sincerity.”
(Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, 961 and Ibn Majah, 2944)
[Author's Note: That means by Almighty Allah's will and power, the
stone will get eyes and tongue on the Day of Resurrection]
Ibn `Umar said: I
heard the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) say: “Touching
them both [the Black Stone and Al-Rukn Al-Yamani] is an expiation for sins.”
(Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, 959. This Hadith was classed as sound by
At-Tirmidhi and as authentic by Al-Hakim (1/664). Adh-Dhahabi agreed with
him)--- [1]
Short Note on Ibn Umar's Narration: Sin Expiation vs Sin Removal
Sin Expiation: I guess people mostly get confused here about the expiation of sins which refers to the act of making amends often involves sincere repentance, performing good deeds or specific acts of worship such as charity, fasting three days for breaking the promise with Allah to seek Allah's forgiveness. Like that kissing or touching the black stones falls under this category as it is mentioned in the previous hadith.
Sin Removal: This as we know means to be the complete eradication or absence of sins. For example, idolaters may be seen to ask forgiveness towards an earthly object like idols, tree or even animals as they believe those objects can remove their sins. But in the context of Islamic belief, true removal of sins is ultimately in the hand of Allah swt. Sins are considered removed when Allah forgives them, often contingent upon genuine repentance or expiations. The black stone does not have the power of removing someone's sins, instead it serves as a reminder of the importance of repentant and expiation.
However, No, it is not. Kissing the stone does not mean to be worshipping it. Not a single Muslim claims or believes that the stone is something like a self-capable deity nor it is written in the Qur'an and Hadith. Muslims only kiss it because Prophet Muhammed PBUH said so. There is a hadith,`Umar came near the Black Stone and kissed it and said "No doubt, I know that you are a stone and can neither benefit anyone nor harm anyone. Had I not seen Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) kissing you I would not have kissed you."
(Sahih al-Bukhari 1597).
Straw-Man fallacy: This fallacy involves misrepresenting a belief to make it easier to attack. Muslim do not believe the Black Stone has a power to remove sins. Instead, It is considered as a sacred object due to its historical significance, and the act of kissing it is symbolic, intended as an expression of devotion rather than an act that grant forgiveness.
Shaykh Muhammad ibn ’Uthaymin further said,
Misinterpretation Fallacy: The belief that Allah can grant the black stone to ability to speak or bear witness on the day of judgement is a manifestation of his unique and absolute power.
Surah Fussilat (41:21)
"On this Day We will seal their mouths, their hands will speak to Us, and their feet will testify to what they used to commit."
Surah Ya-Sin (36:65)
So literally you can see Allah can make all things speak even the skins!
![]() |
symbolic |
The biblical story of the bronze serpent is found in the Numbers 21:4-9. while journeying through the wilderness, the Israelites complained against God and Moses. Then God sent venomous serpents that bit and killed many. The people repented and asked Moses to pray for them. God then instructed Moses to build a "bronze serpent" (an idol?!) and set it on a pole. Anyone who was bitten could look at it and be healed!
Now I have some questions regarding this bronze serpent.
1. It is clearly an Idol isn't it? No?
2. Why did God order Moses to build a bronze statue? Was it really necessary?
3. How can someone look at that idol and then get healed?
Humm, Now you are talking! Then why do you chose the path of Double Standard when it is about The Black Stone!
So at the end, they might accuse you of applying the False Equivalence between The Black Stone and The Bronze Serpent. To argue that comparing those is not a false equivalence, you can present a short structured arguments with clear premises.
Our Claim: The comparison between the black stone and the bronze serpent is not a false equivalence but highlights significant parallels in their roles as symbol of divine mercy and human reliance to God.
premise 1: Both symbols serve as Reminders of Divine Mercy
- Supporting Argument: Both the Black Stone and the Serpent function as physical reminder of God's mercy. The black stone represents God's forgiveness and mercy during the Hajj pilgrimage, while the bronze serpent signifies God's mercy in healing the Israelites from snake bites.
premise 2: Both engage believers in Acts of Faith
premise 3: Both represent Unique historical context with spiritual Significance
- Supporting Argument: The black stone, believed to have been sent down from heaven, serves as a focal point of unity and devotion among Muslims during Hajj. On the other hand, the bronze serpent is linked to a pivotal moment of deliverance and healing for Israelites. Both narratives simply highlight key aspects of their respective faiths and divine intervention.
premise 4: Different Roles but Similar Themes
- Supporting Argument: The Black Stone as a symbol of repentance and the Bronze Serpent as an instrument of healing. Neither the Black Stone grant the forgiveness nor the bronze serpent healed the Israelites by itself. The underlying themes of divine mercy, grace and reliance on God Almighty remain constant.
Conclusion from given arguments:
- Both symbolize divine mercy and engage believers in acts of faith.
- The underlying themes of reliance on God and pursuit of forgiveness bind these symbols together.
(Next part will be updated soon...)
Reference:
[1] https://islamqa.info/en/answers/1902/virtues-of-the-black-stone
[2] https://islamqa.info/en/answers/118085/why-do-muslims-kiss-the-black-stone